Why the “Worse” PM Job Might Be the Safer One Right Now

I used to think my biggest strength as a product leader was being a breaker of silos. I’m a business and systems architect at heart — the kind who refuses to just “ship fast” and instead builds systems and processes that make good products easier to ship.

The irony? Those same systems may have made it easier to replace the decision-making with AI.

That’s why a recent post about two Senior PMs stuck with me:

  • Senior PM A — Clear roadmap, supportive team, space to decide, loves the job.
  • Senior PM B — Constant firefighting, no clear goals, drowning in meetings, exhausted.

Same title. Same salary. Completely different realities.


The obvious answer

Most people see this and think: “Clearly, Senior PM A has the better gig. Who wouldn’t want clarity, respect, and breathing room?”

I agree — if you’re talking about today’s workplace.


The AI-era twist

In a well-oiled, optimized system, Senior PM A’s decisions follow predictable patterns: Quarterly planning? Review the metrics, weigh the trade-offs, pick a path. Feature prioritization? Run it through the scoring model. Resource allocation? Follow the established framework.

Those are exactly the kinds of structured, rules-based decisions AI can handle well — not because they’re trivial, but because they have clear inputs and repeatable logic.

Senior PM B’s world is different. One week it’s killing a feature mid-sprint because a major client threatened to churn over an unrelated issue. The next, it’s navigating a regulatory curveball that suddenly affects three product lines. Then the CEO declares a new strategic pivot — immediately.

This isn’t just chaos. It’s high-stakes problem-solving with incomplete data, shifting constraints, and human dynamics in the mix. Right now, that’s still work AI struggles to do.


Why chaos can be strategic

If you’re Senior PM B, you’re not just firefighting. You’re building skills that are harder to automate:

  • Reading between the lines — knowing when “customers are asking for this” means three key deals are at risk vs. one loud voice in the room.
  • Navigating crosscurrents — redirecting an “urgent” marketing request toward something that actually moves the business.
  • Making judgment calls with partial data — acting decisively while staying ready to adapt.

These skills aren’t “soft.” They’re advanced problem-solving abilities: reading between the lines, navigating political currents, and making judgment calls with partial data. AI can process information, but right now, it struggles to match human problem-solving in high-context, high-stakes situations.


How to use the advantage

If you’re in the chaos seat, you have leverage — but only if you’re intentional:

  1. Document your decisions — keep a log that shows how you reason through ambiguity, not just what you decided.
  2. Translate chaos into patterns — identify which recurring problems point to deeper systemic fixes.
  3. Build your network — the people you can call in a pinch are as valuable as any process.

The long game

Eventually, AI will get better at handling some of this unpredictability too. But the people best positioned to design that AI? They’re the ones who’ve lived the chaos and know which decisions can be structured — and which can’t.


The takeaway

In the AI era, the “worse” jobs might be the ones teaching you the most resilient skills — especially the hardest to teach: problem solving. So, if you’re Senior PM B right now, you may be tired — but you’re also learning how to make high-context, high-stakes calls in ways AI can’t yet match.

The key is to treat it as training for the future, not just survival in the present.

The Ultimate Candidate-Centric Hiring Manifesto

“If your hiring process doesn’t reflect your culture, it’s not a process problem. It’s a values problem.” ~ Walter Reid

“Company culture doesn’t begin after someone signs the offer. It starts the moment they open the job application.” ~Walter Reid


🛠️ This manifesto is a living document. If you believe in building hiring processes that reflect real values—not just efficiency—join the conversation and help improve it at github.com/walterreid/HiringManifesto.

1. The Line in the Sand

There was a time when software developers drew a line in the sand. Tired of waterfall charts, rigid documentation, and soul-crushing overhead, they wrote the Agile Manifesto.

We wrote manifestos for how we build. How we ship. How we scale. But somewhere along the way, we forgot to write one for how we hire.

We treated recruiting as logistics. A funnel. A handoff. A problem to optimize, not a reflection of who we are. And that’s how ghosting became normalized. That’s how candidates became collateral damage in the pursuit of efficiency.

But let’s be honest: the hiring process is the first real experience someone has with your company’s culture. Not the all-hands. Not the onboarding packet. Not the “day one” laptop drop.

It starts the moment they open the job application. Not just when they apply—but the moment they read it. Because what you say, how you say it, what you leave out — that’s already shaping their perception of who you are and how you operate.

So let’s stop pretending the hiring process is separate from culture. It is your culture. Just exported through email, calendars, and silence.

The good news? You don’t need a hundred-step policy doc to fix this. You need values that show up before the offer letter. And maybe, a new kind of manifesto.


2. The Comment That Got It Right

Sometimes a comment says more than a policy ever could. This one did:

“I grew frustrated by being ghosted back when I was a candidate, so, at my company, we have a ‘no ghosting’ policy. When the HR team screens candidates, we let them know about this during the phone screen and what to expect. We strive to maintain that as best we can. Candidates deserve to know where they stand.”

I saw this and thought: this is it. This is what culture in hiring looks like. Not a platitude. A practice.

So I responded with this:

“What I often hear in response is: ‘Well, my team treats candidates right,’ or ‘Our process is good—it’s just the hiring manager who dropped the ball.’ And honestly, that’s fair. But it’s also the point. That’s your process, not your company’s values showing through. Your comment shows what it looks like when a company leads with values from the first interaction. It’s not just a ‘good process’—it’s a culture you can feel. That’s rare. And it’s worth emulating.”

That’s the goal. Not just making fewer mistakes—but building a hiring experience that feels like your culture on day zero. Because if it doesn’t, your values aren’t real. They’re just words on a wall.


3. The Candidate-Centric Hiring Manifesto

We are uncovering better ways to attract and integrate talent by doing it—and by helping others do it. Through this work, we’ve come to value:

  • Human connection and empathy over automated processes and impersonal tools
  • Candidate experience and dignity over recruiter convenience and expediency
  • Transparent and timely communication over ambiguity and silence
  • Constructive feedback and growth over ghosting and lack of closure
  • Equitable opportunity and trust over inherent bias and rigid filters
  • The foundational relationship over the transactional hire

That is, while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more.

This isn’t about making the perfect system. It’s about refusing to let the messy parts define you. Because candidates will forgive a bad interview. They won’t forgive being treated like they never existed.

Your culture is not what you promise — it’s how you handle the small moments. The calendar reschedule. The “no” that comes three weeks too late. The feedback that never arrives.

If you believe in clarity, show it in your timelines. If you believe in empathy, show it in your rejections. If you believe people matter, don’t make them guess.

This manifesto isn’t finished. But neither is your hiring process. Let’s make both better — together.


4. Principles Behind the Manifesto

A great hire isn’t just about who you choose—it’s about how you chose them. And how you made every other candidate feel in the process. Culture isn’t just who you are on the inside. It’s what people experience on the outside. The hiring process is your first test.

If a customer walked into your store and was ignored for three weeks, you’d fix it immediately. So why is that acceptable for someone trying to work for you?

Our guiding principles include:

  • Our highest priority is to create a positive and respectful experience for every candidate, recognizing their time and effort.
  • We welcome diverse perspectives and unconventional backgrounds for the richness they bring.
  • We provide timely and consistent updates throughout the hiring process.
  • Hiring teams and candidates must collaborate transparently to assess fit.
  • We build processes around the candidate’s journey and trust them to represent their best selves.
  • The most effective method of conveying expectations is clear, human communication.
  • A positive candidate experience is the primary measure of success.
  • Our process must promote sustainable growth for both candidate and company.
  • We continuously improve fairness, clarity, and connection in how we hire.
  • Simplicity—the art of removing unnecessary hoops—is essential.
  • The best hires emerge from collaborative, human-centered interactions.
  • At regular intervals, we reflect on our hiring process and tune it for impact.

Candidates are future hires. Future advocates. Future customers. And even when they don’t get the role, they deserve your clarity, your honesty, and your respect.

Because ghosting isn’t just bad manners. It’s bad culture.


5. Practical Steps to Live the Manifesto

To make this manifesto more than words, companies must embed its values into every stage of hiring. These practices turn principles into action:

  • Automated and Personalized Acknowledgments: Send immediate confirmation of application receipt with a clear timeline for next steps.
  • Clear Job Descriptions: Write transparent, concise job postings that reflect the role’s reality and the company’s culture, avoiding jargon or unrealistic expectations.
  • Consistent Communication: Update candidates at every stage, even if there’s no progress, to avoid the “black hole” syndrome.
  • Constructive Feedback: Provide specific, actionable feedback to rejected candidates when feasible, fostering growth and goodwill.
  • Efficient Processes: Streamline interviews and assessments to respect candidates’ time, eliminating redundant steps or unnecessary hoops.
  • Hiring Team Training: Equip recruiters and interviewers with skills to embody empathy, clarity, and fairness, aligning with the manifesto’s values.
  • Bias Mitigation: Use structured interviews and diverse hiring panels to reduce unconscious bias and promote equitable opportunity.
  • Candidate Feedback Loops: Solicit input from candidates post-process to refine and improve the hiring experience continuously.

These steps ensure the manifesto’s values—empathy, transparency, and dignity—are felt by every candidate, building a hiring process that reflects your culture from the first interaction.


6. Hiring With Humanity.

Your hiring process is the first product a candidate experiences. And if that product is buggy, opaque, or dehumanizing? Don’t expect them to believe your culture is any different.

Every candidate journey matters. Let this be our manifesto—felt from the first open tab to the final offer, or the kindest rejection letter they’ll ever receive.

What Happens When Your Life Changes: Walter Reid’s Thoughts on Losing His Job

💡 Only when the world feels upside down can you truly see what’s beneath your feet.💡

Eighteen months ago, my world turned upside down when I lost my job at Mastercard. For a long while, I felt uncertain and unsteady. What is a product manager without a product, after all? 🤔

But over time, people have helped me realized something very important: my path forward was the product I needed to manage. That shift in mindset – treating my own growth and direction as a product – pushed me to take on challenges I never imagined, bringing growth and fulfillment in ways I couldn’t have predicted.

A few takeaways that have stuck with me:
1️⃣ Keep your head up: The toughest decisions often lead to the most meaningful change. It’s not easy, but resilience starts with taking that first step forward. ✨

2️⃣ Be present in the moment: It’s tempting to focus on the “what ifs,” but real progress comes from focusing on “what’s right in front of you”. 🌱

3️⃣ Embrace the unknown: Oh boy… growth really means stepping into the uncomfortable. What scared me at first turned out to be exactly what I needed. 😳➡️💪

So, if you’re navigating a moment of change or uncertainty, I want you to know you’re not alone. It can feel overwhelming, but clarity often comes when you least expect it.

Honestly, I’m here to help. Whether you need advice, encouragement, or just someone to listen, I’d love to support you as you find your footing again—no strings attached. 🤝

Here’s to growth, resilience, and stepping boldly into the unknown in 2025. 🌟

hashtag#GrowthMindset hashtag#Resilience hashtag#CareerPivots hashtag#Leadership hashtag#SmallBus

✍️ Written by Walter Reid at https://www.walterreid.com

🧠 Creator of Designed to Be Understood at (LinkedIn) https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/designed-to-be-understood-7330631123846197249 and (Substack) https://designedtobeunderstood.substack.com

🧠 Check out more writing by Walter Reid (Medium) https://medium.com/@walterareid

🔧 He is also a (subreddit) creator and moderator at: r/AIPlaybook at https://www.reddit.com/r/AIPlaybook for more tactical frameworks and prompt design tools. r/AIPlaybook at https://www.reddit.com/r/BeUnderstood/ for additional AI guidance. r/AdvancedLLM at https://www.reddit.com/r/AdvancedLLM/ where we discuss LangChain and CrewAI as well as other Agentic AI topics for everyone. r/PromptPlaybook at https://www.reddit.com/r/PromptPlaybook/ where I show advanced techniques for the advanced prompt (and context) engineers. Finally r/UnderstoodAI https://www.reddit.com/r/UnderstoodAI/ where we confront the idea that LLMs don’t understand us — they model us. But what happens when we start believing the model?